Showing posts with label US Debt. Show all posts
Showing posts with label US Debt. Show all posts

Sunday, January 9, 2011

Sleight of Hand, Part 2

Chronicles is a magazine that I cannot recommend highly enough. I try to swing by and read what is written there at least once a week. The analysis is excellent and, even if I disagree with what is written there, I find I still learn something.

Pat Buchanan has an article from December 31, 2010, entitled Is a Bond Crisis Inevitable? Here we review some excerpts:

With Christmas shoppers out in force and the stock market surging to a two-year high, talk is spreading that the long-awaited recovery is at hand.

Perhaps.

But gleaning the news from Europe and Asia as U.S. cities, states and the federal government sink into debt, it is difficult to believe a worldwide financial crisis that hammers governments, banks and bondholders alike can be long averted. Consider.

[snip]

If anyone is an alarmist, it is The New York Times. In an editorial the day after Christmas, "The Looming Crisis in the States," the Times writes, "Illinois, California and several other states are at increasing risk of being the first states to default since the 1930s."

California and Illinois are to America what Germany and Spain are to the European Union—the first and fifth largest states.

Illinois, writes the Times, "is faced with $4 billion in overdue payments." The state "has lacked the money to pay its bills. Some of its employees have been evicted from their offices for nonpayment of rent, social service groups have laid off hundreds of workers while waiting for checks, pharmacies have closed for lack of Medicaid payments." Illinois is also still borrowing to finance half of its budget.

By Sept. 30, the U.S. government will have run three straight deficits of close to 10 percent of GDP. And Barack Obama and the GOP just passed $858 billion in new and extended tax cuts and fresh spending.

[snip]

In America, it is the Fed that is the last line of defense and has shown a disposition to act in a financial crisis.

Since 2008, it has doubled the money supply and taken a trillion dollars in bad debt off the books of U.S. banks. Secretly, it has lent trillions to banks and businesses all over the world and is now buying U.S. bonds to inject more dollars into the economy.

But how does the Fed prevent a state like Illinois from failing to meet its debt obligations and defaulting? How does the Fed prevent a series of municipal bond defaults by cities and counties that lack the tax revenue to pay their bills and whose credit rating has reached a junk-bond status where they can no longer borrow?

Congress would have to vote the bailout money. But will a House that owns its majority to the Tea Party approve half a trillion dollars to bail out Democratic-run cities or Obama's home state or Jerry Brown's California?

This June, the stimulus money runs out, and as housing prices continue to fall across America, property tax revenue will fall.

The Feds are about to stop bailing out the states, and the states, on shortening rations, will stop bailing out counties, cities and towns.

We may be closer to the falls than we imagine.

The first commentator seemed rather optimistic, explaining that a crisis is not a mistake, but rather the correction of a mistake. In principle, the commentator's logic is correct, but attempts to apply such logic to our financial system tend to shipwreck on the rocky shores of our monetary system. My response:

The trouble is, this crisis is not the correction of a mistake. Instead, it is the perpetuation of a mistake. The international banking elite peddles debt to us, on which they charge us interest, and call that debt "money". They create "money" with an entry on a computer; most of it they don't even have to print.

Since the "money" is debt - a loan - any "money" they create is the principle on the loan; not enough "money" is created to pay the interest on the loan. To do that, they have to "print" more "money" - in other words, give us a new loan, on which we pay interest. Since the loan we need to pay the interest is itself another loan accumulating interest, we need yet another loan to pay that.

We are in perpetual debt to those who control the US money supply and the money supplies of significant parts of the industrialized world. The situation is engineered so that the way out is difficult to find. Control of the money supply by these elites have made our economies the de facto slaves of these elites and, since our ability to own the fruits of our labors has been so fundamentally compromised, the net result is our gradual enslavement at the hands of these banking elites.

These crises are not corrections of mistakes; they are symptoms of an extremely significant underlying problem.

Debt being peddled as "money", with Congress taking its Constitutional authority to coin money for the United States and outsourcing that authority to self-interested private enterprise operations under the auspices of the Federal Reserve, is a federal problem that requires a federal fix. And while there are some elected officials in Washington who are addressing the issue, you can bet the bulk of them will not back a bill to fix the problem, nor will the financiers' White House lapdog sign it.

So, what can be done?

From Fear of defaults putting pressure on municipal bonds, January 3, 2011:

Investors are panicky about losing their money in municipal bonds and have been calling their financial advisers for assurances since a recent "60 Minutes" TV show predicted massive bond defaults by local governments over the next 12 months.

"When people hear 'defaults,' they imagine bankruptcy like a Madoff event, with their money gone," said Lewis Altfest, a New York financial adviser who's been getting some of those nervous calls. "It's difficult for individuals psychologically because they think of bonds as their safe area, their no-worry zone."

Instead of safe, financial analyst Meredith Whitney said in the "60 Minutes" interview that there "is not a doubt in my mind" that there will be defaults, perhaps totaling hundreds of billions of dollars, because many states, cities and counties can't pay their bills.

Whitney commands national attention because she ignored Wall Street's smiling faces prior to the 2008 financial crisis and detailed the underlying banking messes that ultimately led to a near collapse of the system. Now, she said, the economy is threatened by ongoing declines in housing values and unwillingness by states, counties and cities to take their financial problems seriously.

Since her interview, critics have challenged the size of her default prediction, which some estimate at about 10 percent of the $3 trillion municipal bond market.

Still, they do not argue with her underlying concern: For a decade or more, many state and local governments have been pretending they could afford pension promises and spending without coming to grips with how they would pay.

Now, many are obligated to meet promises but have less tax money than imagined as layoffs and plunging home and real estate values leave tax coffers deficient. The problem could get worse as the year goes on because billions in help from the federal government will end.

"All they have to do is raise taxes, and the whole thing goes away, but that may be more difficult to do than to think about doing," Altfest said. So he's been telling clients that their concerns are legitimate within reason.

Raising taxes is not the answer. The economy is already suffering. Burdening it further with increased taxes might just kill the goose that lays the golden eggs.

Very few people understand that (up to a point) lowering the tax rate increases productivity, and thus raises tax revenue.

From Bond Default Is About Too Much Debt, Too Little Time: Joe Mysak, July 20, 2010:

The last time a state defaulted on its bonds, it took eight years and the federal government's help to come up with a remedy.

When Arkansas defaulted on its bonds in 1933, the politicians and investors talked about the same things we would talk about today. The state blamed underwriters for allowing it to sell too many bonds. Investors compared the willingness to repay debt with the ability to pay, and weighed the advantages of bonds backed by a pledge of taxing powers to those secured by specific revenue.

Unlike today, nobody thought the federal government should come to the rescue.

The author goes on to describe how Arkansas rebounded without help from the federal government. Please read the entire article.

But, there is still that issue of debt being peddled as money, and the federal government's outsourcing of its Constitutional power to coin money, making us all pay interest as the fee collected by private enterprise to create "money" for us to use.

Thursday, June 10, 2010

Let's Switch Sides

First, the vid from Fed Chief: Gov't Budget on 'Unsustainable Path', June 10, 2010:



The key excerpts of the text from the report:

WASHINGTON -- Just as huge government debts have already wrecked countries throughout Europe, the Federal Reserve warned that the nation's mounting federal debt is a threat to America's economy.

In testimony on Capitol Hill Wednesday, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke said the United States has to do something to get its deficits under control.

While Bernanke expressed the belief the economy "appears to be back on track," he cautioned it'll be difficult to get the rising federal debt under control.

"The federal budget appears to be on an unsustainable path," the Fed chief said.

He called on lawmakers to come up with a plan to reduce the federal deficit.

The national debt currently stands at a massive $13 trillion. Five years from now, it's expected to grow just shy of $20 trillion, according to the Treasury Department.

Budget hawks have been worried the U.S. is headed down the same financial path as Europe, which is roiled by debt crises across the continent.

From Bin Laden: Goal is to bankrupt U.S., dated November 2, 2004:

(CNN) -- The Arabic-language network Al-Jazeera released a full transcript Monday of the most recent videotape from Osama bin Laden in which the head of al Qaeda said his group's goal is to force America into bankruptcy.

Al-Jazeera aired portions of the videotape Friday but released the full transcript of the entire tape on its Web site Monday.

"We are continuing this policy in bleeding America to the point of bankruptcy. Allah willing, and nothing is too great for Allah," bin Laden said in the transcript.

Well, guess what!

Sheikh bin Laden is winning!!


Now, let me ask some questions.

Who funds the radicalization of the world's mosques, the construction of new mosques, and the Wahabbi propaganda to be found in them?

Who has established special training programs in Medina for the world's Muslims to study and become firebrand jihadist mullahs, who are then returned to the infidel "house of war" from which they came to work towards the submission of infidels under the new Caliphate?

Who is really behind all the terrorism, inciting all the jihad that we infidels are dealing with?

Is it not the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia?

And, since Saudi Arabia is far from being a free country... I mean, Christians can't preach there, Jews can't preach there; you can only preach there if you have the permission of the Saudi government... can we not then jump to the conclusion that all this hatred and jihad would not be getting spewed at us if it weren't for the active collaboration of the Saudi government? The Saudi government doesn't just permit these jihadist preachers to spew their venom at the "house of war", the Saudi government funds it!

Ready for the punchline?

Why is Sheikh bin Laden really mad at us? Because we are infidels? Because of Israel?

From Bin Laden's Target: U.S. Wallet, November 2, 2004:

"From the very beginning of his terror campaign, bin Laden's fight was with the Saudi rulers of the Arabian Peninsula," [CBS News Consultant Fouad] Ajami wrote in The Wall Street Journal. "America was to pay for its protection of the House of Saud. The causes bin Laden picked up along the way — the cause of Iraq, the call of Palestine — were always incidental to him, weapons of convenience."

I have an idea.

Why don't we switch sides?

Let's team up with Al Qaeda and destroy the Saudi government!

We can always go back and finish our fight with Al Qaeda later on... ;)

Wednesday, May 12, 2010

A Rant About Government-Run Healthcare

There is a discussion at the Berlin website forum about healthcare. The system is having real problems processing my full comment. I have spent nearly a day now trying to post this response. It has taken some of it, broken into small pieces. Anyway, the complete response is here:

__________


Those with real money have always known that war is profitable. They have always enjoyed having a good war, knowing that war is expensive. Both sides go into debt to buy weapons to destroy things. Later, when peace breaks out, there is money to be made rebuilding things.

However, in the wake of the Great Depression, this point was really driven home. World War II really got the world out of the Depression and into an economic boom.

Those that run things never forgot that lesson.

But, the war ended too soon.

So, along came Vietnam - a high-tech war, and one with no clear objectives, so day for day, battle for battle, the price would be far higher, and no one would ever be able to declare victory, like they did in World War II.

Trouble was, the folks back home decided they had had enough.

Then, the Cold War ended, too. Bad for business.

But, no big deal. We now have a War on Terror. We are waging war against an abstract noun, so there is no way it will ever end. Were we not told so by our Decider-in-Chief? This war would be unlike any other war, and would not end in our lifetimes. Big bucks to be had fighting the war, providing contract support to the military, rebuilding Iraq and Afghanistan... and this is one war we will not soon get tired of, because of how it started, and in any case, protests will be kept under control - they have a far better system to monitor us now; the Patriot Act was just the icing on the cake.

And don't think it ends there.

The education industry in this country functions similarly. It is a de facto government monopoly. Oh, you can open a private school, you can even send your kids to a private school; but first, you will contribute to the government-run school, whether or not you send your kids there, whether or not you even have kids. Imagine if some other industry worked like that: You WILL buy these tires, whether or not you put them on your car, whether or not you even have a car!

No matter how bad the government-run school system works, there is a lobby that has a death grip on it, and will not let go, because big money is to be made trying to educate "the masses". By the way, that is how they think of us: not as people, but as "the masses". They fan the flames of propaganda, making sure more and more money gets thrown at the problem, because no politician wants to be the one who left some child behind.

There is not a lot of money to be made winning a war compared with how much can be made TRYING to win it year after year. Similarly, there is not a lot of money to be made by the education industry and its lobbyists in actually educating American kids compared to what can be made by trying year after year to educate them and failing miserably; the failure is spun into a call for more resources, so more money gets poured down the gopher hole.

The US spent $9,138 per student in 2006. The least amount spent per pupil is in Utah, at $5,257, and the most is in New York, at $14,119 [source].

What do we get for this money? Kids that aren't ready for college, who can often not read adequately, who are not prepared in history or geography; our country's students flat out suck in math and science. Of course, there are exceptions, but too many kids learn that they are owed something, and they learn to not appreciate opportunities they are offered.

By the way - one added plus to our government-run education system is that it graduates people woefully inadequate to the responsibilities of citizenship in a free country. That's great, because they don't want us to think for ourselves and question what we're told.

If I wanted to destroy the United States, I couldn't think of a better way of doing it than going after our educational system and turning it into what it has become - though Osama bin Laden's strategy of bankrupting us in war is working like a charm.

Our current national debt is nearly $13,000,000,000,000; that's almost $42,000 per person. That's not per family, that's per person. A kid born today in the US has that debt hanging over her or his head at birth. Since a newborn can't pay that off, interest will be charged until this young person graduates from our sucky school system and gets a low-paying job in the service industry to start paying on that debt. If it ever gets paid off, it will cost at least three quarters of a million dollars to pay that.

Fantastic Shannon, I don't have that kind of money. Do you? Terri, do you have that kind of money to throw away?

Now, guess what! The guys who brought you all this are now in charge of health care. Just like with national security, where the money is to be made by the process of fighting and rebuilding, not winning the war - just like with government education, where the money is to be made having schools that fail, not in actually graduating people ready to be effective citizens and workers in a high-tech industrialized world... Now, the money is to be made not in having people healthy or cured of diseases, but rather in treating diseases of people who are sick.

That is, until it gets to be too much of a "burden on society", and they start rationing healthcare. Some countries with wonderful socialized medicine now refuse to treat the obese or smokers. I am not a smoker, I find smoking disgusting; but, it is legal, and is it not someone's right to smoke? However, smokers have become a politically compromised group, whose rights can be trodden upon when convenient. Who will argue that scarce medical resources should go to a smoker who isn't trying to quit?

In Nazi Germany, those who held no political power at first were the incurably insane. It took valuable resources to keep them alive - resources that could go to healthy people. So, the incurably insane were "euthanized". They were the first victims of the Holocaust. Sure, later the Nazis went after the Poles, the Gypsies, the Jews, and everyone else - but it started with the incurably insane.

And don't for a moment think this government takeover of medicine won't lead to government rationing. And from there, where? The road to Auschwitz and Buchenwald is very much shorter than we may think.

Now, ready for the punchline? The money that gets used to pay for all this... we pay interest just to have the money in existence. The Federal Reserve is a private corporation; it is no more "federal" than Federal Express. They charge us interest just to have money in circulation - money which they are able to create at no cost, because most of the US dollars in circulation are just some digits in an electronic ledger somewhere.

This healthcare won't be free, or cheap, or universal. With the government in charge, it will get more and more expensive, and more and more scarce for those of us who aren't the "elite", and the money we have available to pay for it with will be less and less - and we will continue to pay interest on that little bit of money.

Now, someone - please prove me wrong.

__________


UPDATE: I was finally able to post something else at the forum, so I posted a link back here.

I'm not trying to take anyone's traffic away, just trying to participate in the discussion, which I applaud Terri Nunn for having. Though I disagree with her viewpoint, I admire that she is getting involved in this political mess by voicing a public opinion, even though doing so may alienate some fans.

Please check out the Berlin Website, and check out the music of Terri Nunn and Berlin - it's awesome!

Monday, March 29, 2010

Sold Out

This is outrageous.

This is immoral.

This is wrong.

This is our federal debt:


This is how our federal debt has grown since 1997:


If you divide our current US Federal Debt by our current population according to the US Census Bureau, you will see that each person in the US owes just under $42,000.

And don't, for a moment, think that they have slowed down spending.

The Clintonite provincial corruption was outdone by the cronyistic looting done by Bush's Banana Republicans, but now the Obamanistas are going for full-scale socialism.

Never mind your wallet - it's empty. Now count the IOU's.

__________


How will WE THE PEOPLE pay for this?

We the citizens of today won't be able to. At best, we could turn it around, and pay the interest, and begin to pay some of the principle.

It will be up to our children and to our grandchildren to actually get out from under this.

How will this happen?

Much of what we now owe, we owe to foreign nations.

How can this be paid off?

__________


We could sell our Navy. How much would a dozen carrier battle groups be worth? And the ballistic missile and attack submarines? How much would the Communist Chinese give for our Navy? They could use our amphibious groups to take Taiwan!

Or, we could sell our Air Force. The Saudis already have an arsenal of American-made warplanes. Would they like some strategic bombers, tankers, and a few ballistic missiles? A couple of decades ago, they were buying ballistic missiles from China, but the missiles were of poorer quality. And, they have options on Pakistan's nukes. Maybe they would pay big petrodollars to have better missiles with their own warheads on them?

How's about selling our Army? Who would be in the market for a few divisions' worth of tanks and armored vehicles?

I know - let's sell real estate. The National Park Service and the Bureau of Land Management have extensive holdings, especially out west. What would Yosemite National Park, or the Little Big Horn National Monument, be worth? The Communist Chinese could be our neighbors... Hell, they could be our landlords!

__________


America has been sold out.

Those politicians in Washington sold our future and the future of our children to buy our votes today with their entitlements and other federal programs.

And WE THE PEOPLE have been letting them do it.