Wednesday, March 17, 2010

What Would It Be Like?

What would it be like to live in the days of our American Revolution?

What would it be like to know people of the caliber of John Hancock, Paul Revere, Patrick Henry, or all the others?

What would it be like to hear them speak of the threat posed by a government that had become out-of-control, destructive of the welfare of the majority, a pawn of a powerful minority?

What would it be like to witness people of such caliber as they defend themselves in court against allegations of treason?

Text of the translation of the Hon. Mr. Wilders' speech below:

Mister Speaker, judges of the court, I would like to make use of my right to speak for a few minutes.

Freedom is the most precious of all our attainments and the most vulnerable. People have devoted their lives to it and given their lives for it. Our freedom in this country is the outcome of centuries. It is the consequence of a history that knows no equal and has brought us to where we are now.

I believe with all my heart and soul that the freedom in the Netherlands is threatened. That what our heritage is, what generations could only dream about, that this freedom is no longer a given, no longer self-evident.

I devote my life to the defence of our freedom. I know what the risks are and I pay a price for it every day. I do not complain about it; it is my own decision. I see that as my duty and it is why I am standing here.

I know that the words I use are sometimes harsh, but they are never rash. It is not my intention to spare the ideology of conquest and destruction, but I am not any more out to offend people. I have nothing against Muslims. I have a problem with Islam and the Islamization of our country because Islam is at odds with freedom.

Future generations will wonder to themselves how we in 2010, in this place, in this room, earned our most precious attainment. Whether there is freedom in this debate for both parties and thus also for the critics of Islam, or that only one side of the discussion may be heard in the Netherlands? Whether freedom of speech in the Netherlands applies to everyone or only to a few? The answer to this is at once the answer to the question whether freedom still has a home in this country.

Freedom was never the property of a small group, but was always the heritage of us all. We are all blessed by it.

Lady Justice wears a blindfold, but she has splendid hearing. I hope that she hears the following sentences, loud and clear:

It is not only a right, but also the duty of free people to speak against every ideology that threatens freedom. Thomas Jefferson, the third President of the United States was right: The price of freedom is eternal vigilance.

I hope that the freedom of speech shall triumph in this trial.

In conclusion, Mister Speaker, judges of the court.

This trial is obviously about the freedom of speech. But this trial is also about the process of establishing the truth. Are the statements that I have made and the comparisons that I have taken, as cited in the summons, true? If something is true then can it still be punishable? This is why I urge you to not only submit to my request to hear witnesses and experts on the subject of freedom of speech. But I ask you explicitly to honour my request to hear witnesses and experts on the subject of Islam. I refer not only to Mister Jansen and Mister Admiraal, but also to the witness/experts from Israel, the United States, and the United Kingdom. Without these witnesses, I cannot defend myself properly and, in my opinion, this would not be an fair trial.

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. That whenever any form of government becomes destructive to these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shown that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such government, and to provide new guards for their future security."

In an historical context, the above words are the words of a patriot. Speak them today, with reference to ongoing events, and does the act make you a terrorist?

How long will it be until those who have sworn to protect our Constitutional rights in this country are sent into the streets to deprive us of those rights?


  1. I don't think that they will use our own Army against us. It is no secret that they have troops from other countries here in the US and are training them. Some of them are even living on our own bases here in America.

    However, in today’s world is anyone disagrees with our government, we are considered a "terrorist".

    By the way, I am the owner of Artful Thoughts. Thanks for the comment!

  2. Training some foreign troops on US soil is fine. Some troops are assigned for extended training, or are here on exchange, so are living here for months to a couple of years. Again, nothing wrong with that.

    It is not the military I am mainly concerned about. I am more worried about decent, hard-working law enforcement personnel, who find themselves working for elected and appointed officials who are the very people that should be arrested.